Search
  Advanced Search
 
Journal search
Journal cover: COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

ISSN: 0332-1649

Online from: 1982

Subject Area: Electrical & Electronic Engineering

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Comparison of pull-in voltages in MEMS using 3D FEM and analytical approaches


Document Information:
Title:Comparison of pull-in voltages in MEMS using 3D FEM and analytical approaches
Author(s):Francisc Bölöni, (L2EP-USTL, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France), Abdelkader Benabou, (L2EP-USTL, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France), Abdelmounaïm Tounzi, (L2EP-USTL, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France)
Citation:Francisc Bölöni, Abdelkader Benabou, Abdelmounaïm Tounzi, (2010) "Comparison of pull-in voltages in MEMS using 3D FEM and analytical approaches", COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 29 Iss: 6, pp.1653 - 1661
Keywords:Electromechanical devices, Finite element analysis, MEMS, Voltage
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/03321641011078715 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Acknowledgements:This work has been carried out in the frame of the Belgian IAP “IPOLFE”.
Abstract:

Purpose – Electrostatic microelectromechanical systems are characterized by the pull-in instability, associated to a pull-in voltage. A good design requires an accurate model of this pull-in phenomenon. The purpose of this paper is to present two approaches to building finite element method (FEM) based models.

Design/methodology/approach – Closed form expressions for the computation of the pull-in voltage, can provide fast results within reliable accuracy, except when treating cases of extreme fringing fields. FEM-based models come handy when high accuracy is needed. In the first model presented in this paper, the FEM is used to solve the electrostatic problem, while the mechanical problem is solved using a simplified Euler-Bernoulli beam equation. The second model is a pure FEM model coupling the electrostatic and mechanical problems iteratively through the electrical force. Results for both scalar and vector potential formulations for the FEM models are presented.

Findings – In this paper a comparative study of simple pull-in structures is presented, between analytical and 3D FEM-based models. A comparison with analytical models and experimental results is also realized.

Research limitations/implications – The coupling between the electrostatic and mechanical problem in the presented approaches, is iterative. Therefore, to improve the accuracy of the presented model, a strong coupling is needed.

Originality/value – In the presented FEM-analytical model, the electrostatic problem is solved in both, scalar and vector electric potential formulations. This allows defining an upper and a lower limit for the electrostatic force and consequently for the pull-in voltage.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (112kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions