Online from: 1983
Subject Area: Library and Information Studies
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||Bloggership, or is publishing a blog scholarship? A survey of academic librarians|
|Author(s):||Arthur Hendricks, (Branford Price Millar Library, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA)|
|Citation:||Arthur Hendricks, (2010) "Bloggership, or is publishing a blog scholarship? A survey of academic librarians", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 28 Iss: 3, pp.470 - 477|
|Keywords:||Academic libraries, Academic staff, Career development, Communication, Internet|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/07378831011076701 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
Purpose – The aim of this paper is to gauge how academic libraries treat publishing a blog.
Design/methodology/approach – As blogging becomes more popular, the question arises as to whether it should count as scholarship or a creative activity in academic promotion and tenure. To find out, the author sent a link to a questionnaire to several e-mail lists, inviting academic librarians to answer a short survey.
Findings – In total, 73.9 percent of respondents indicated that their institution expects them to engage in scholarly activities and/or publish scholarly articles, 53.6 percent indicated that their performance review committees do not weigh a blog the same as an article published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Research limitations/implications – As technology changes, policies will need to change.
Practical implications – Libraries may need to adapt to new forms of scholarship. Electronic scholarship needs a mechanism for peer-review.
Originality/value – The paper is original – the author did not find any other surveys regarding blogging as scholarship in the library literature.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian