Online from: 1983
Subject Area: Library and Information Studies
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||Evaluating accessibility features of tutorial creation software|
|Author(s):||Diana K. Wakimoto, (University Libraries, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, California, USA), Aline Soules, (University Libraries, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, California, USA)|
|Citation:||Diana K. Wakimoto, Aline Soules, (2011) "Evaluating accessibility features of tutorial creation software", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 29 Iss: 1, pp.122 - 136|
|Keywords:||Librarians, Libraries, Tutorials|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/07378831111116958 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Acknowledgements:||The authors wish to thank California State University, East Bay for providing the initial funding for this project through an internal Faculty Support Grant.|
Purpose – This paper seeks to compare the accessibility features and ease of use of three tutorial creation products – Camtasia® 6 (by TechSmith®), Captivate® 4 (by Adobe®), and VoiceThread® – to determine which product creates the most accessible tutorials.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper tested the accessibility of the tutorials created using Camtasia, Captivate, and VoiceThread against the Voluntary Product Accessibility Template® (VPAT®) criteria. The tests were completed using JAWS®, a screen-reading software application. Results were compared to determine which product(s) created the most accessible tutorials. The products' ease of use and user manuals were also evaluated.
Findings – Camtasia and Captivate exceed VoiceThread in terms of accessibility compliance. In testing the products, the paper concluded that the VPATs were accurate, with minor exceptions. All products provide user manuals and help guides; Camtasia and Captivate have steeper learning curves than VoiceThread.
Research limitations/implications – This study compares only three of the available tutorial creation products. Accessibility features may change with new versions.
Practical implications – The results of the evaluation will enable other librarians to make more informed decisions when purchasing and using tutorial creation products.
Social implications – Ensuring accessibility of online resources is everyone's responsibility. This paper will help readers to meet that goal.
Originality/value – While there are comparison studies of the features of Camtasia, Captivate, and VoiceThread, accessibility features are largely uncovered. This study adds this dimension to the literature, enabling librarians to make more informed decisions when selecting and using these products to create accessible tutorials.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian