Towards an understanding of the participatory library

Linh Cuong Nguyen; Helen Partridge; Sylvia L. Edwards

doi:10.1108/07378831211239997

Login

Welcome:
Guest

Search for:

Browse:

Product Information:

Resources:

Library Hi Tech

ISSN: 0737-8831

Online from: 1983

Subject Area: Library and Information Studies

Content: Latest Issue | Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Towards an understanding of the participatory library

Document Information:
Title:	Towards an understanding of the participatory library
Author(s):	Linh Cuong Nguyen, (Faculty of Science and Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia), Helen Partridge, (Faculty of Science and Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia), Sylvia L. Edwards, (Faculty of Science and Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
Citation:	Linh Cuong Nguyen, Helen Partridge, Sylvia L. Edwards, (2012) "Towards an understanding of the participatory library", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 30 Iss: 2, pp.335 - 346
Keywords:	Library 2.0, Library users, Participatory library, Participatory technologies, Social media, Web 2.0
Article type:	Conceptual paper
DOI:	10.1108/07378831211239997 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:	Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:	Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to debate the evolving relationship between libraries and users, and to justify the idea of participatory library and the use of the “participatory library” term. The paper also discusses the development trend of the participatory library and calls for empirical research on this area. Design/methodology/approach – Various sources of literature are collected and examined. Together with the inclusion of personal ideas and experience, a wide range of opinions on the contemporary library is compared and synthesised. Findings – The paper presents changes in the relationship between libraries and users in various periods of library development. It indicates an excessive attention on Library 2.0 while neglecting the participatory nature of the contemporary library. It also suggests that the term “participatory library” should be used as this term reflects the true nature of the contemporary library, and calls for empirical work on participatory library. Originality/value – This discussion is moving forward and challenging our thinking about the participatory library. It provides librarians, library managers, scholars, and the library community with a fresh perspective on the contemporary library.