Joint forest management in India and its ecological impacts

K.S. Murali; Indu K. Murthy; N.H. Ravindranath

doi:10.1108/09566160210441807

Login

Welcome:
Guest

Search for:

Browse:

Product Information:

Resources:

Environmental Management and Health

ISSN: 0956-6163
Currently published as: Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal

Online from: 1990

Subject Area: Managing Quality

Content: Latest Issue | Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Joint forest management in India and its ecological impacts

Document Information:
Title:	Joint forest management in India and its ecological impacts
Author(s):	K.S. Murali, (French Institute, Pondicherry, India,), Indu K. Murthy, (Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India), N.H. Ravindranath, (Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India)
Citation:	K.S. Murali, Indu K. Murthy, N.H. Ravindranath, (2002) "Joint forest management in India and its ecological impacts", Environmental Management and Health, Vol. 13 Iss: 5, pp.512 - 528
Keywords:	Ecology, India, Joint consultation, Recruitment, Urban regeneration
Article type:	Case study
DOI:	10.1108/09566160210441807 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:	MCB UP Ltd
Abstract:	Ecological impact of joint forest management (JFM) in India was assessed using the studies undertaken at national, state and forest division levels. It was found that there are very few studies that have specifically addressed the ecological aspects under JFM. The study noted that there are significant strides made in promoting JFM, but the program still needs to address a lot of inadequacies. Though it is estimated that little over 14 million ha of forests are brought under JFM, covering nearly 50 per cent of the open forests in India, how much of it has developed into good forests is not really known. It also needs to be noted that there are many lacunae in implementation of the program and there are also gaps in policies to promote JFM. The study noted that in four states, i.e. Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and West Bengal, the recruitment was significant, amounting to 17 per cent of the regenerating individuals. In Karnataka, over 10 per cent of open forest has been brought under JFM, while a lot of wasteland could still be brought under JFM. The JFM plantations are dominated with exotic firewood species and low in timber and non-timber species, resulting in lower biodiversity. Biomass growth rate was comparatively higher in JFM forests as compared to the national average. Other support activities to JFM indicated that various biomass conservation programs were initiated, installing a substantial number of energy saving and alternate energy devices. However, the study also notes that effectiveness of such support programs is not clearly known in terms of its functioning and biomass saved.