Advanced Search
Journal search
Journal cover: Journal of Knowledge Management

Journal of Knowledge Management

ISSN: 1367-3270

Online from: 1997

Subject Area: Information and Knowledge Management

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues


Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Facilitating new knowledge creation and obtaining KM maturity

Document Information:
Title:Facilitating new knowledge creation and obtaining KM maturity
Author(s):Priscilla A. Arling, (Assistant Professor of Management Information Systems at the College of Business, Butler University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA), Mark W.S. Chun, (Associate Professor of Information Systems at Graziadio School of Business and Management, Pepperdine University, Los Angeles, California, USA)
Citation:Priscilla A. Arling, Mark W.S. Chun, (2011) "Facilitating new knowledge creation and obtaining KM maturity", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 15 Iss: 2, pp.231 - 250
Keywords:Case studies, Knowledge management, Modelling
Article type:Case study
DOI:10.1108/13673271111119673 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Acknowledgements:Received: 18 May 2010. Accepted: 18 October 2010

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe a framework designed to assess the capacity of a knowledge management (KM) system to facilitate new knowledge creation.

Design/methodology/approachA longitudinal case study methodology, in a single company, Pratt Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR), was used to test the framework.

FindingsNew knowledge creation is best supported through mature KM systems that include all four modes of knowledge creation: combination, externalization, socialization, and internalization. KM systems and environments as a whole reach maturity by progressing through stages, which is presented as a KM maturity model.

Research limitations/implicationsBy combining Nonaka's knowledge creation theory with Wittrock's generative learning activities, the paper illuminates both the why and how of new knowledge creation, in a way that can be applied to KM technological initiatives. One of the limitations of this study is the generalizability of the findings, which may be limited by the single case study method used.

Practical implicationsThe framework provides a rubric against which both old and new KM initiatives can be assessed to determine whether they are capable of generating new knowledge. The maturity model provides a template against which organizations can map their progress towards a mature KM environment.

Originality/valueMuch of the literature on KM systems has focused on capturing knowledge and disseminating it. Few studies have provided practical, theoretically based advice on how to create new knowledge and what aspects of information systems can facilitate that creation. The framework and maturity model can serve as guides in that process.

Fulltext Options:



Existing customers: login
to access this document


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login



Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (346kb)

Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.

To purchase this item please login or register.


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian

Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions