ISSN: 1463-578X
Previously published as: Journal of Property Valuation and Investment
Online from: 1999
Subject Area: Built Environment
Content: Latest Issue |
Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
| Title: | Liquidity risk exposure for specialised and unspecialised real estate banks: Evidence from the Italian market |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | Claudio Giannotti, (University of LUM Jean Monnet, Casamassima, Italy), Lucia Gibilaro, (University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy), Gianluca Mattarocci, (University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy) |
| Citation: | Claudio Giannotti, Lucia Gibilaro, Gianluca Mattarocci, (2011) "Liquidity risk exposure for specialised and unspecialised real estate banks: Evidence from the Italian market", Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol. 29 Iss: 2, pp.98 - 114 |
| Keywords: | Banks, Italy, Liquidity, Real estate, Risk assessment |
| Article type: | Research paper |
| DOI: | 10.1108/14635781111112756 (Permanent URL) |
| Publisher: | Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
| Acknowledgements: | The authors are members of Laboratory of Real Estate Finance instituted by the PhD in Banking and Finance of University of Rome “Tor Vergata”. This paper is the result of the authors' common efforts and continuous exchange of ideas. The individual sections of the paper can be acknowledged as follows: section 1 and 4 to Claudio Giannotti, section 2 to Lucia Gibilaro and section 3 to Gianluca Mattarocci. |
| Abstract: | Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare banks specialised on real estate lending with the overall market in order to the test if they are more or less exposed to liquidity risk. Design/methodology/approach – Following the approach proposed by the Basel Committee in order to evaluate the bank liquidity exposure, the paper compares the value of these measures between the real estate lending banks (REBs) and all other banks for the Italian market. A panel regression analysis is also performed in order to identify the main drivers of the liquidity risk measures for the two types of banks. Findings – The paper finds that no significant differences exist between REBs and the overall system if liquidity risk measures used by regulators in order to supervise the banking system are taken into account. Normally liquidity exposure by this type of bank is significantly affected by interbank market dynamics. Research limitations/implications – The paper considers only one market in order to test the fitness of the regulatory approach for the REBs and does not take into account the off balance sheet exposure. Practical implications – Even if REBs suffer from a misalignment between the asset and liability duration, the supervisory authority selects measures that do not penalise them. Originality/value – The paper represents one of the first empirical analyses on the impact of regulatory requirements for liquidity management by the Basel Committee in order to test if the rules proposed could penalise banks specialised in real estate loans. |
Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (212kb)
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian