Online from: 2000
Subject Area: Education
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||Transforming knowledge for sustainability: towards adaptive academic institutions|
|Author(s):||Thaddeus R. Miller, (School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA), Tischa Muñoz-Erickson, (School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA), Charles L. Redman, (School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA)|
|Citation:||Thaddeus R. Miller, Tischa Muñoz-Erickson, Charles L. Redman, (2011) "Transforming knowledge for sustainability: towards adaptive academic institutions", International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 12 Iss: 2, pp.177 - 192|
|Keywords:||Adaptability, Knowledge creation, Sustainable development, Universities|
|Article type:||Conceptual paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/14676371111118228 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Acknowledgements:||This paper was a truly collaborative effort. As such, the authors are listed in alphabetical order. They thank the faculty and students of SOS for insightful comments even if they did not know they were giving them as well as the SOS Lunchtime Colloquium Series for giving a couple of graduate students the chance to discuss some of their own trials and tribulations. This material is based on work supported in part by the NSF IGERT Grant No. 0504248 in Urban Ecology to the Global Institute of Sustainability at ASU. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF, ASU or SOS.|
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to argue that the types of and ways in which academic institutions produce knowledge are insufficient to contribute to a transition to sustainability.
Design/methodology/approach – Reflecting on experiences at the School of Sustainability, the authors contend that a different kind of knowledge is needed, what we call sustainability knowledge. A conceptual approach is taken wherein the authors propose several characteristics of sustainability knowledge and offer some proposals on how academic institutions must be structured to produce it.
Findings – Sustainability knowledge has several characteristics including social robustness, recognition of system complexity and uncertainty, acknowledgement of multiple ways of knowing and the incorporation of normative and ethical premises. In order to produce sustainability knowledge, the knowledge production process itself must be changed to be more adaptive and engaged with society. Two organizing characteristics for institutions seeking to produce such knowledge are proposed – epistemological pluralism and reflexivity. The adaptive cycle from resilience theory is then used as a heuristic to illustrate how these design characteristics play out in making the institution (and individual) more adaptive.
Practical implications – As more academic institutions move to address sustainability, this paper does not offer a roadmap; rather, it raises important issues that must be addressed in performing research and education for sustainability.
Originality/value – The paper shows that type of knowledge that academia must produce and how it might produce it are redefined for sustainability problems.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian