Online from: 1977
Subject Area: Library and Information Studies
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||A snapshot of information use patterns of academics in British universities|
|Author(s):||Donna Gardiner, (Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK), David McMenemy, (Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK), Gobinda Chowdhury, (Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK)|
|Citation:||Donna Gardiner, David McMenemy, Gobinda Chowdhury, (2006) "A snapshot of information use patterns of academics in British universities", Online Information Review, Vol. 30 Iss: 4, pp.341 - 359|
|Keywords:||Academic staff, Behaviour, Digital libraries, Information retrieval, United Kingdom, Universities|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/14684520610686274 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
Purpose – This paper aims to study information behaviour of academics in the digital age. Compares information behaviour of British university academics in three disciplines – computer and information sciences, business/management, and English literature.
Design/methodology/approach – Discusses information behaviour of academics in the digital age.
Findings – English academics make higher use of printed information resources, such as text and reference books, than academics of any other discipline included in this study; they generally tended to be the least frequent users of electronic resources such as full-text databases, indexing and abstracting databases, search engines, and internet sites. CIS academics generally tended to make greatest use of electronic-based information resources, and the least use of print-based information resources, and business/management academics fell somewhere in between these two disciplines. CIS academics were generally the most enthusiastic about the benefits of electronic resources, whereas English academics were the least enthusiastic about them. Nearly a quarter of English academics disagreed to some extent that electronic information was easier to use than printed resources, which might go some way to explain their lower use of electronic materials, and higher use of printed materials.
Research limitations/implications – Results of the quantitative study should have been supported and substantiated by quantitative analyses. Similar studies involving users from many more disciplines could show better discipline-wise differences in user behaviour.
Originality/value – This is a research paper based on a nation-wide survey of academics in British universities.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian