Online from: 2001
Subject Area: Built Environment
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||A methodology for evaluating construction innovation constraints through project stakeholder competencies and FMEA|
|Author(s):||Martina Murphy, (School of the Built Environment, University of Ulster, Newtonabbey, UK), George Heaney, (School of the Built Environment, University of Ulster, Newtonabbey, UK), Srinath Perera, (School of the Built and Natural Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK)|
|Citation:||Martina Murphy, George Heaney, Srinath Perera, (2011) "A methodology for evaluating construction innovation constraints through project stakeholder competencies and FMEA", Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, Vol. 11 Iss: 4, pp.416 - 440|
|Keywords:||Construction industry, FMEA, Innovation constraints, Procurement process, Risk assessment, Stakeholder competencies|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/14714171111175891 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a methodology for extracting innovation constraints from building projects through stakeholder management competencies and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA).
Design/methodology/approach – The methodology was an iterative grounded theory process using case studies. A literature-based concept model was generated which mapped project procurement stages against the innovation process. Constraints and stakeholder management strategies were extracted from 30 case studies using content analysis and mapped against the procurement stages. FMEA was used to evaluate the criticality of the constraints. For the purposes of this paper, a sample case study was detailed and referred to as the pilot study. The m\ethodology was applied to all the case studies and a schedule of constraints (SoC) extracted.
Findings – This paper evidenced that it is not project constraints which require management to sustain innovation but rather failures in stakeholder competency. This study established the benefits of FMEA as a risk assessment tool for construction innovation research and generated a database of innovation constraints which can be used as a benchmarking framework for future research.
Originality/value – Previous construction innovation research has focused on established project management techniques to manage innovation. This study identified that rather than a process-driven approach, a stakeholder-centred approach is required, where successful innovation delivery is incumbent on the right stakeholder competencies being in place at the appropriate stages of the procurement process. The benefit of this contribution is an established risk assessment methodology which can be used by project stakeholders when adopting innovation into construction projects.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian