Online from: 1988
Subject Area: Industry and Public Sector Management
|Title:||The effects of perceived funding trends on non-profit advocacy: A national survey of non-profit advocacy organizations in the United States|
|Author(s):||Robert Mark Silverman, (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA), Kelly L. Patterson, (School of Social Work, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA)|
|Citation:||Robert Mark Silverman, Kelly L. Patterson, (2011) "The effects of perceived funding trends on non-profit advocacy: A national survey of non-profit advocacy organizations in the United States", International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 24 Iss: 5, pp.435 - 451|
|Keywords:||Decision making, Non-profit organizations, United States of America|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/09513551111147169 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Acknowledgements:||This research was supported in part by an annual research grant from the Baldy Center for Law & Social Policy at the University at Buffalo. The authors would like to thank Jodi Stelley for research assistance. They would also like to thank Joyce Liddle and the reviewers from the International Journal of Public Sector Management for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.|
Purpose – This paper seeks to examine executive directors' perceptions of the relationship between access to funding and an organization's programmatic and advocacy activities.
Design/methodology/approach – This study is based on data from a national survey of executive directors of non-profit advocacy organizations in the USA. The organizations were selected because they served minority and disadvantaged groups, and were heavily reliant on public funding.
Findings – The findings indicate that several factors are associated with how organizations balance their programmatic and advocacy activities. They include dependence on public funding, constituencies served, and perception of funders. Despite evidence for institutional pressures to reduce advocacy activities, the results indicate that such activities are sustainable in organizations with a strong individual donor base. In essence, a stable source of grassroots resources can counter institutional pressures to reduce advocacy.
Research limitations/implications – This study focuses on a specific subgroup of advocacy organizations. Although it offers insights into their perceptions, the findings do not necessarily reflect more general perceptions.
Social implications – The findings enhance understanding of impediments to non-profit advocacy that stem from trends in public funding and regulations related to non-profit lobbying and advocacy activities. The findings also enhance understanding of the extent to which the influences of the emerging non-profit industrial complex are offset by traditional grassroots support for non-profit advocacy.
Originality/value – This paper adds to the body of research on non-profit decision making in relation to the balance between programmatic and advocacy work. It adds to the understanding of how organizations interface with larger institutions in society and the constraints that institutional ties entail.
Existing customers: login
to access this document
Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (104kb)
Due to our platform migration, pay-per-view is temporarily unavailable.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian