Predicted temperature development on protected cellular steel beam (CSB) under fire exposure

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the predicted temperature behaviour of the protected cellular steel beam (CSB) with circular web openings at elevated temperature through finite element simulation.

Design/methodology/approach

Temperature development along the CSB were analysed and used for parametric investigation. In addition, this research paper investigates the novelty application of various intumescent coating thicknesses covering the whole CSB to cut down the temperature development along the beam section.

Findings

From the simulation outcomes, it shows that intumescent coating has a significant effect in reducing the temperature development along the CSB section. Thicker intumescent coating contributes to a higher temperature drop at the bottom tee section than the upper tee section.

Originality/value

The use of structural CSB has gained popularity among engineers and architects. This type of beam allows serviceability ducts and pipes to pass through the main steel web section under the flooring system, thus providing larger headroom for designers. Nevertheless, in any structural steel building, it is highly risky for CSB to be exposed to fire hazard if it were triggered accidentally. To mitigate and reduce fire exposure risk which might compromise the strength and stiffness of CSB, a passive fire protection is proposed to minimise the risk. One of the common passive fire protection materials used for steel beam section is intumescent coating. Intumescent coating is by far the cheapest solution to protect CSB as compared to other passive fire protection system. Intumescent coating can absorb some portion of heat exposure which subsequently translates a lower temperature development along the CSB section.

Citation

Ahmad Zakwan, F.A., Ismail, R., Krishnamoorthy, R.R. and Ibrahim, A. (2020), "Predicted temperature development on protected cellular steel beam (CSB) under fire exposure", Journal of Structural Fire Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-10-2018-0030