To read this content please select one of the options below:

Comparing patients’ experience of mental health services in England: a five‐Trust survey

Yvonne Webb (Independent Research Consultant, Centre for Outcomes, Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College, London, UK)
Paul Clifford (Independent Research Consultant, London, UK)
Vanessa Fowler (Challenging Behaviour Therapist, Richmond Royal Hospital, Richmond, UK)
Celia Morgan (Researcher, Centre for Outcomes, Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College, London, UK)
Marie Hanson (Researcher, Centre for Outcomes, Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College, London, UK)

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

ISSN: 0952-6862

Article publication date: 1 November 2000

999

Abstract

The implementation of the Care Programme Approach (CPA) in English mental health services has been slow to proceed despite general support, both in England and in other countries, of its principles of good practice. This study set out to evaluate the implementation of the CPA directly from patients’ experience using the “Your Treatment and Care” assessment tool. The results of a survey of 503 patients across five NHS Trusts in England showed that many patients did not have a copy of their care plan and had not been involved in the care planning procedure. Many reported shortcomings in their experience of their key worker and their psychiatrist. However, there was substantial variation in experience across services. “Your Treatment and Care” showed good internal reliability, was acceptable to users, and appeared to be able to access actual experiences better than a traditional “satisfaction” item. It appears to be very useful as a benchmarking tool and is now being used in services across the UK, the USA and Australia.

Keywords

Citation

Webb, Y., Clifford, P., Fowler, V., Morgan, C. and Hanson, M. (2000), "Comparing patients’ experience of mental health services in England: a five‐Trust survey", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860010373253

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2000, MCB UP Limited

Related articles