To read this content please select one of the options below:

Design for occupational safety and health: key attributes for organisational capability

Patrick Manu (School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Anush Poghosyan (The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Abdul-Majeed Mahamadu (Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK)
Lamine Mahdjoubi (University of the West of England, Bristol, UK)
Alistair Gibb (Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK)
Michael Behm (East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA)
Olugbenga O. Akinade (University of the West of England, Bristol, UK)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 10 May 2019

Issue publication date: 5 November 2019

987

Abstract

Purpose

Against the backdrop of the contribution of design to the occurrence of occupational injuries and illnesses in construction, design for occupational safety and health (DfOSH) is increasingly becoming prominent in the construction sector. To ensure that design interventions are safe for construction workers to build and maintain, design firms need to have the appropriate organisational capability in respect of DfOSH. However, empirical insight regarding the attributes that constitute DfOSH organisational capability is lacking. The purpose of this paper, which trailblases the subject of DfOSH organisational capability in construction, is to address two key questions: what organisational attributes determine DfOSH capability? What is the relative priority of the capability attributes?

Design/methodology/approach

The study employed three iterations of expert focus group discussion and a subsequent three-round Delphi technique accompanied by the application of voting analytic hierarchy process.

Findings

The study revealed 18 capability attributes nested within six categories, namely: competence (the competence of organisation’s design staff); strategy (the consideration of DfOSH in organisation’s vision as well as the top management commitment); corporate experience (organisation’s experience in implementing DfOSH on projects); systems (systems, processes and procedures required for implementing DfOSH); infrastructure (physical, and information and communication technology resources); and collaboration (inter- and intra-organisational collaboration to implement DfOSH on projects). Whilst these categories and their nested attributes carry varying weights of importance, collectively, the competence-related attributes are the most important, followed by strategy.

Originality/value

The findings should enable design firms and other key industry stakeholders (such as the clients who appoint them) to understand designers’ DfOSH capability better. Additionally, design firms should be able to prioritise efforts/investment to enhance their DfOSH capability.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by The UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Grant Nos: EP/N033213/1 and EP/N033213/2). The contribution of the following industry partner organisations is acknowledged: Heathrow Airport, Mott MacDonald, Bam Construction Limited, ISG Construction Limited, Nick Bell Risk Consultancy, GCP Architects and Safety in Design. Appreciation is also extended to the professionals who participated in the study.

Citation

Manu, P., Poghosyan, A., Mahamadu, A.-M., Mahdjoubi, L., Gibb, A., Behm, M. and Akinade, O.O. (2019), "Design for occupational safety and health: key attributes for organisational capability", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 26 No. 11, pp. 2614-2636. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2018-0389

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles