To read this content please select one of the options below:

Time management and polychronicity: Comparisons, contrasts, and insights for the workplace

Carol Kaufman‐Scarborough (Rutgers University, Camden, New Jersey, USA, and)
Jay D. Lindquist (Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA)

Journal of Managerial Psychology

ISSN: 0268-3946

Article publication date: 1 June 1999

7322

Abstract

The goals of this investigation are to identify behaviors and attitudes that are predictive of an individual’s polychronic or monochronic time use, relating these findings to individuals’ time management approaches. A modified polychronic attitude indicator (PAI3) scale is used as the overall measure of monochronic/polychronic tendencies. A series of potential predictor variables from the “structure” portion of the FAST scale, items related to the time structure questionnaire, and other items based on literature synthesis and researcher judgment were used. A stepwise multiple regression analysis resulted in an eight‐predictor variable solution. It was concluded that polychronicity is related to different aspects of time management; recommendations are given for future study and for application in the workplace.

Keywords

Citation

Kaufman‐Scarborough, C. and Lindquist, J.D. (1999), "Time management and polychronicity: Comparisons, contrasts, and insights for the workplace", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 14 No. 3/4, pp. 288-312. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683949910263819

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

Related articles