To read this content please select one of the options below:

Coordination during multi‐agency emergency response: issues and solutions

Paul Salmon (Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia)
Neville Stanton (School of Civil Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK)
Dan Jenkins (Sociotechnic Solutions, St Albans, UK)
Guy Walker (School of the Built Environment, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, UK)

Disaster Prevention and Management

ISSN: 0965-3562

Article publication date: 26 April 2011

5795

Abstract

Purpose

Coordination between military and civilian agencies has previously been found to be a significant issue that affects the efficiency of multi‐agency system responses to large‐scale emergencies. The purpose of this article is to present the findings derived from a case study focussing on the problems that abound when the military attempts to work with civilian organisations.

Design/methodology/approach

An integrated framework of human factors methods was used to analyse a Military Aid to the Civilian Authorities training exercise, involving the army and seven other responding agencies.

Findings

A range of factors that hinder coordination between agencies during multi‐agency emergency responses were identified. Potential solutions for removing these barriers and augmenting coordination levels are proposed.

Practical implications

This research suggests that much further work is required in training and designing multi‐agency response systems and procedures in order to optimise coordination between responding agencies.

Originality/value

This article presents the first attempt to apply structured, theoretically underpinned human factors methods, to understand the problems that abound when the military works with civilian agencies during large‐scale emergency responses.

Keywords

Citation

Salmon, P., Stanton, N., Jenkins, D. and Walker, G. (2011), "Coordination during multi‐agency emergency response: issues and solutions", Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 140-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561111126085

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles