To read this content please select one of the options below:

“Noids” in a nutshell: everything you (don’t) want to know about synthetic cannabimimetics

Duccio Papanti (MD, Psychiatric Trainee and Researcher, based at Psychiatry Residency School, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.)
Laura Orsolini (MD, Psychiatric Trainee and Researcher, based at Psychiatry Residency School, University of Marche, Ancona, Italy)
Giulia Francesconi (MD, Psychiatric Trainee and Researcher, based at Psychiatry Residency School, University of Marche, Ancona, Italy)
Fabrizio Schifano (Consultant Psychiatrist, Chair in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, based at Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK)

Advances in Dual Diagnosis

ISSN: 1757-0972

Article publication date: 12 August 2014

255

Abstract

Purpose

“Spice” products are synthetic cannabimimetics (SC; also called “synthetic cannabinoids”)-based designer drugs used as a legal alternative to cannabis for their very strong tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-like effects. The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of more recent clinical and pharmacology/toxicology findings relating to SC and describe how they could impact on health, with a particular focus on mental health.

Design/methodology/approach

A systematic search and descriptive analysis of the available evidence on psychopathological issues related to misuse was performed here, whilst taking into account the Pubmed/Medline databases, a range of conference proceedings and national/international agencies’ reports.

Findings

While THC is a partial agonist, SC are full agonists on the cannabinoid receptors (CB-rs) and the administration of multiple SC can produce additive and/or synergistic agonistic interaction effects on the endocannabinoid system. These levels of strong CB-rs’ activation may be high enough to produce severe physiological and psychological disturbances. The available evidence suggests an existing relationship between SC use and psychosis (“Spiceophrenia”). The acute SC intoxication is usually characterized by tachycardia/hypertension; visual/auditory hallucinations; mydriasis; agitation/anxiety; tachypnoea; nausea/vomiting; and seizures.

Research limitations/implications

The absence of clinical trials and longitudinal studies, together with the heterogeneity of SC compounds does not facilitate a precise assessment of the health risks related to their use, with long-term effects being of particular concern.

Originality/value

Appropriate, non-judgemental, prevention campaigns with a special focus on the differences between SC and cannabis may need to be organized on a large scale. At the same time, clinicians need to be regularly updated about novel psychoactive substances, including SC, to promptly recognize signs/symptoms of intoxication.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge here the help of David Benjamin, William Freeman, Marianna Purgato, and Ellen Oakley.

Conflicts of interest: F.S. is both a Core Member of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD, UK) and the Chair of the Specialist Advisory Group (Psychiatry) for the European Medicines Agency (EMA). No conflicts of interest are declared here that may have influenced the interpretation of the present data. The European Commission-funded EU-MADNESS project (2014-2016; contract no.: JUST2013/DPIP/AG/4823) resources were used to assist with the preparation of this review.

Citation

Papanti, D., Orsolini, L., Francesconi, G. and Schifano, F. (2014), "“Noids” in a nutshell: everything you (don’t) want to know about synthetic cannabimimetics", Advances in Dual Diagnosis, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/ADD-02-2014-0006

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles