To read this content please select one of the options below:

Developing a benchmarking system for architecture design firms

José Luis Salvatierra (Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile)
Miguel Ángel Gálvez (Department of Architecture, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Valparaiso, Chile)
Freddy Bastías (Department of Architecture, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Valparaiso, Chile)
Tito Castillo (School of Civil Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Riobamba, Ecuador) (Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile)
Rodrigo Fernando Herrera (School of Civil Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile) (Department of Construction Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile) (Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain)
Luis Fernando Alarcón (Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 11 February 2019

Issue publication date: 11 February 2019

917

Abstract

Purpose

The construction industry’s business model is mainly based on the interaction among the architecture office, the engineering office and the construction company. The performance and practices of architects’ offices, unlike those of the other actors, are difficult to characterize and there have been few studies on these issues. To better understand architects’ performance, the purpose of this paper is to develop a benchmarking tool based on real practices identified by managers of Chilean architecture offices.

Design/methodology/approach

The research method includes a complete literature review, followed by a study of a sample of nine Chilean architecture offices, with whom a series of four workshops was developed, to establish both performance indicators and relevant management practices. Finally, these metrics were applied in an architectural office as a pilot case.

Findings

Four management dimensions were defined: client management, external coordination, internal organization and human resources. Key performance indicators were divided into process, financial and quality indicators. The workshops carried out with the architectural offices demonstrated the relevance of benchmarking tools such as the one developed, which enables the systematic measurement of both management practices and performance indicators.

Originality/value

Although there have been several efforts to create benchmarking tools for the construction industry, few efforts have focused on architecture offices. Therefore, this research aims to explicitly identify management practices that can be used for this type of organization and to coordinate among multiple actors to find the best way to measure their performance, other than the fulfilment of schedules and budgets.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding and support provided by CORFO (The Clover, Engineering 2030, PUC-USM), GEPUC, and FONDECYT (1181648) to develop this research. R.F. Herrera acknowledge to VRI Scholarship from Universidad Católica de Chile and CONICYT – PCHA/ National Doctorate/2018 – 21180884 for funding the graduate research.

Citation

Salvatierra, J.L., Gálvez, M.Á., Bastías, F., Castillo, T., Herrera, R.F. and Alarcón, L.F. (2019), "Developing a benchmarking system for architecture design firms", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2018-0211

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles