To read this content please select one of the options below:

Four facets of learning in performance measurement

Jason Martin (Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden)
Mattias Elg (Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden)
Andreas Wallo (Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden)
Henrik Kock (Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden)

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

ISSN: 1741-0401

Article publication date: 19 November 2018

Issue publication date: 19 November 2018

705

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of the role of learning in performance measurement.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors develop a theoretical framework combining workplace learning theory with purposes of performance measurement. The authors elaborate this framework empirically by identifying critical incidents from a case set within a context containing a broad range of different performance measurement activities. Finally, the authors discuss the results and the possible implications for using the theoretical framework in order to better understand facets of learning regarding the design of performance measurement.

Findings

Workplace learning theory provides a deeper understanding of how the mechanisms of performance measurements support control or improvement purposes. The authors propose a tentative framework for learning as a driver for performance measurement and four facets of learning are identified: reproductive, rule-oriented, goal-oriented and creative learning.

Research limitations/implications

The empirical material is limited to the healthcare context and further studies are needed in order to validate the findings in other settings.

Practical implications

The authors argue that all managers must consider what kind of learning environment and what kind of learning outcomes best serve the interests of their organisation. Purposeful and carefully designed organisational arrangements and learning environments are more likely to induce intended learning outcomes.

Originality/value

Previous connections between the fields of “performance measurement” and “workplace learning” often lack any deeper conceptualisations or problematisations of the concept of learning. In this paper, the authors provide a more nuanced discussion about the process of learning in performance measurement, which may provide a basis for further research and scholarly attention.

Keywords

Citation

Martin, J., Elg, M., Wallo, A. and Kock, H. (2018), "Four facets of learning in performance measurement", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 67 No. 9, pp. 1608-1624. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2017-0320

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles