To read this content please select one of the options below:

Quality of life after vaginal and cesarean deliveries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Satar Rezaei (Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran)
Yahya Salimi (Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran)
Telma Zahirian Moghadam (Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran)
Tiba Mirzarahimi (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran)
Mohammad Mehrtak (Department of Health Information Management, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran)
Hamed Zandian (Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran)

International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare

ISSN: 2056-4902

Article publication date: 19 June 2018

Issue publication date: 2 July 2018

131

Abstract

Purpose

There are so many studies which evaluated the maternal quality of life based on their delivery type with different results. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effect of type of delivery on the maternal QOL systematically.

Design/methodology/approach

In this systematic review, which was conducted for 15 years (2000-2016), the international databases including PubMed, Scopes and ISI and the Persian databases were searched using the following words: quality of life or health-related quality of life, vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery or cesarean section. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) was adopted for this study. The quality of articles was assessed by a checklist that has been used in previous studies. All of the data analysis was performed using STATA ver.12.

Findings

In total, 13 articles were included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall sample included 8,136 women (3,990 cesareans vs 4,146 vaginal). The results of the random effect model for eight QOL dimensions based on SF-36 questionnaire showed that there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of QOL. But this model for four QOL dimensions of WHOQOL showed that the maternal in two groups had a significant difference in two dimensions of QOL (mental health and total health) and insignificant difference in other dimensions.

Research limitations/implications

The results of the study may have been affected by the selection of few databases. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to test the proposed propositions in further databases.

Practical implications

The study results could be helpful to design appropriate policies for maternal based on their type of delivery.

Originality/value

This systematic review showed that despite the insignificant difference between women with vaginal delivery vs women with cesarean delivery in some aspects of QOL, it can be concluded that health status of women with vaginal delivery is better than women with cesarean delivery, so it should be considered in the setting of appropriate policies and implementation framework to encourage women for choosing the appropriate delivery type.

Keywords

Citation

Rezaei, S., Salimi, Y., Zahirian Moghadam, T., Mirzarahimi, T., Mehrtak, M. and Zandian, H. (2018), "Quality of life after vaginal and cesarean deliveries: a systematic review and meta-analysis", International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-01-2018-0001

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles