To read this content please select one of the options below:

Training needs analysis: weaknesses in the conventional approach

Michael James Leat (Senior Lecturer, Human Research Studies, University of Plymouth, UK)
Murray Jack Lovell (Director, Hemsley Fraser Training Group, Plymouth, UK)

Journal of European Industrial Training

ISSN: 0309-0590

Article publication date: 1 June 1997

6238

Abstract

Preliminary study into the changing task roles of administrative support staff suggests that their training and development may be unduly and unhelpfully influenced both by management whim and by the flaws inherent in the application of conventional performance appraisal techniques. Drawing from a review of the literature, questions the reasons for undertaking performance appraisals and develops the argument that conventional appraisal methodology typically concentrates on the “summary” (or comparative) effectiveness of employees at the expense of meaningful diagnostic evaluation. Further suggests that in order to determine training and developmental needs effectively, techniques need to be devised which combine analysis at a number of different levels. Presents a conceptual model, and proposes behavioural expectation scales as tenable mechanisms for facilitating gainful diagnosis and constructive needs analysis.

Keywords

Citation

Leat, M.J. and Jack Lovell, M. (1997), "Training needs analysis: weaknesses in the conventional approach", Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599710171396

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1997, MCB UP Limited

Related articles