MANAGEMENT FRAUD RISK FACTORS: AN EXAMINATION OF THE SELF-INSIGHT OF AND CONSENSUS AMONG FORENSIC EXPERTS

Abstract

Over the past two years, fraudulent financial reporting has become a major concern of both the Securities and Exchange Commission and investors. These concerns have been spurred by evidence that several high-profile companies such as Enron, Tyco, WorldCom, and HealthSouth have published false and/or misleading financial reports. Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 82 specifies that auditors have a responsibility to assess the likelihood of management fraud and identifies specific risk factors that should be considered when making that assessment. Apostolou et al. (2001b) examined how internal and external auditors rate the relative importance of these factors. This study extends Apostolou et al. (2001b) by examining how forensic experts at four Big 5 professional service firms assess the factors specified in SAS No. 82. These assessments produced two different models of relative importance: (a) a statistical model (produced by the Analytic Hierarchy Process); and (b) a subjective model (based on subjects’ assessment of the relative weights). These models are then used to assess the self-insight of and the degree of agreement among the forensic experts. The results indicate that forensic experts have a moderately high degree of self-insight. A moderate to high degree of consensus among experts’ judgments about the relative importance of fraud risk factors was noted.

Citation

Webber, S.A., Apostolou, B. and Hassell, J.M. (2004), "MANAGEMENT FRAUD RISK FACTORS: AN EXAMINATION OF THE SELF-INSIGHT OF AND CONSENSUS AMONG FORENSIC EXPERTS", Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research (Advances in Accounting Behavioural Research, Vol. 7), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 75-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1488(04)07004-8