To read this content please select one of the options below:

Appraisal pitfalls and the training implications – Part 2

W. David Rees (Visiting Lecturer, University of Westminster, London, UK.)
Christine Porter (Chair of the Human Resource Management Department, Westminster Business School, University of Westminster, London, UK.)

Industrial and Commercial Training

ISSN: 0019-7858

Article publication date: 1 January 2004

3997

Abstract

In this two‐part article the problems of operating employee appraisal schemes effectively are identified. Appraisal of formal appraisal schemes suggests that most do not operate satisfactorily. Multi‐purpose schemes can be cumbersome and include conflicting objectives. The feedback process can also cause major problems. Such problems can be exacerbated with schemes of 360‐degree appraisal according to their complexity and the role conflicts they can precipitate. In the second part of the article the level of organisational investment needed for schemes to operate effectively is considered. The ways in which competencies, self‐appraisal, and peer audit can be constructively used are examined. Competencies developed for selection purposes may be usefully applied in appraisal, provided they are accurate. The crucial link between formal and informal appraisal processes is considered as is the importance and skills involved in informal appraisal. Finally, the way in which the training needs of appraisees need to be realistically identified and assessed is explained.

Keywords

Citation

Rees, W.D. and Porter, C. (2004), "Appraisal pitfalls and the training implications – Part 2", Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850410516094

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2004, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles