To read this content please select one of the options below:

Different roles, different perspectives: perceptions about the purpose of training needs analysis

Jill Bowman (Based at On‐Target‐Training, Coventry, UK.)
John P. Wilson (Researcher at the Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. He is also a tutor on the M Ed in Training and Development at the University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.)

Industrial and Commercial Training

ISSN: 0019-7858

Article publication date: 1 February 2008

8232

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the experiences of managers who underwent a training needs analysis (TNA) within a large bus transport company. It compares their perceptions of the TNA process with two external groups of training managers and training consultants. Recommendations are made to address and reconcile the differing interpretations and misunderstandings which occur between the different groups about TNA.

Design/methodology/approach

The approach uses qualitative grounded theory to identify the main perspectives about the purpose of training needs analysis.

Findings

The findings are that business needs are the main focus of the TNA. The various actors in the TNA process should be aware of their part in the process. Line managers should receive instruction in TNA.

Originality/value

The article addresses the similarities and differences which are found among training managers, training consultants, and managers who were recipients of training needs analysis.

Keywords

Citation

Bowman, J. and Wilson, J.P. (2008), "Different roles, different perspectives: perceptions about the purpose of training needs analysis", Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 38-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850810841639

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles