Rate my research dot com: measuring what we value, and valuing what we measure

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to question the dominance of citation metrics in the evaluation of the impact of research and prompt debate on how to evaluate impact in different contexts.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper takes the form of a viewpoint and review of how metrics are used currently and presents recommendations for change.

Findings

Whilst recognising the continued relevance and importance of citation as a measure of impact, the paper highlights how this measure overshadows all other types of impact (on practice, teaching, public policy, society) and, in turn, has the potential to distort academic research practice.

Research limitations/implications

Additional research should follow to identify other methods of evaluating research impact with a specific emphasis on the development of usage metrics.

Practical implications

The paper calls on all parties within the research dissemination process (academics, publishers, funding bodies) to formulate new ways of evaluating research.

Originality/value

The paper challenges current thinking on how to evaluate research and makes a number of recommendations, specifically around article usage.

Citation

Peters, J. and Marsh, R. (2009), "Rate my research dot com: measuring what we value, and valuing what we measure", Management Decision, Vol. 47 No. 9, pp. 1452-1457. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910995657