To read this content please select one of the options below:

Competence, competency and competencies: performance assessment in organisations

David R. Moore (David R. Moore is a Lecturer at the Manchester Centre For Civil and Construction Engineering, UMIST, Manchester, UK.)
Mei‐I Cheng (Mei‐I Cheng is a Research Associate in the Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.)
Andrew R.J. Dainty (Andrew R.J. Dainty is a Lecturer, in the Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.)

Work Study

ISSN: 0043-8022

Article publication date: 1 November 2002

8849

Abstract

A number of confusions within the area of performance assessment with regard to the use of terminology, and differing interpretations, regarding competence assessment are discussed. A significant difference between the US and UK approaches to performance assessment is identified as being the issue of behaviours. A hierarchy of terms and their specific meanings is proposed as a first step in addressing the identified confusions. A particular aspect of this hierarchy is its relevance to assessment based on behaviours and attitudes rather than simply on the results of functional analysis concerning a particular job. This has implications for the future direction of performance assessment in the UK, particularly with regard to identifying the differences between average and superior performance.

Keywords

Citation

Moore, D.R., Cheng, M. and Dainty, A.R.J. (2002), "Competence, competency and competencies: performance assessment in organisations", Work Study, Vol. 51 No. 6, pp. 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/00438020210441876

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2002, MCB UP Limited

Related articles