To read this content please select one of the options below:

Exploring risks faced by child workers in Britain

Sandy Hobbs (Child Employment Research Group, School of Social Sciences, University of West Scotland, Paisley, UK)
Seonaid Anderson (Child Employment Research Group, School of Social Sciences, University of West Scotland, Paisley, UK)
Jim McKechnie (Child Employment Research Group, School of Social Sciences, University of West Scotland, Paisley, UK)

International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

ISSN: 0144-333X

Article publication date: 24 April 2009

503

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent of accidents amongst child workers and to test the hypothesis that the tendency to have an accident is related to low perception of risk.

Design/methodology/approach

Over 700 Year 10 school students answered questionnaires concerning their experience of employment. The school students completed another questionnaire in year 11; from these 55 working children were selected to be interviewed and respond to a new tool, the Job Risk Card Sort.

Findings

Whereas 45 per cent of the interviewees had reported having had an accident in the questionnaire, this rose to 80 per cent in the interview. Those who stated in the questionnaire that they had had an accident tended to have lower perception of risk on the card sort than those who did not, thus supporting the hypothesis.

Research limitations/implications

Previous questionnaire‐based research on accidents amongst young workers may have underestimated their extent. Further investigation of risk perception and accidents should be undertaken with a larger sample and more sophisticated techniques.

Practical implications

Procedures to safeguard young workers against accidents should be strengthened.

Originality/value

This is the most detailed study of accidents to child employees so far undertaken in Britain.

Keywords

Citation

Hobbs, S., Anderson, S. and McKechnie, J. (2009), "Exploring risks faced by child workers in Britain", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 29 No. 3/4, pp. 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330910947543

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles