Barriers to social support among low‐income mothers
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
ISSN: 0144-333X
Article publication date: 20 April 2012
Abstract
Purpose
The literature on personal networks suggests that individuals who have a limited ability to contribute to their network run the risk of being socially excluded and are often denied assistance. The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent to which poor health and adverse life‐events constitute barriers to support from personal networks among low‐income mothers in the USA.
Design/methodology/approach
Using survey data from the Welfare, Children, and Families: A Three City Study (n=1,910), this study estimates a series of ordinary least squares regression and change models to test direct and mediated associations between poor health, adverse life‐events, and perceived support.
Findings
Both the cross‐sectional and longitudinal analyses show that mothers who suffer from psychological distress report lower support than their healthier counterparts, so do mothers with poor physical health. Domestic violence is also found to be negatively associated with support, but its effect is mainly driven by poor health. No effect is revealed for either substance abuse or engagement in illegal activities.
Research limitations/implications
The restricted character of the sample may leave differentials by socioeconomic status unrevealed.
Social implications
The most vulnerable and disadvantaged mothers, those in greatest need for support, are the least likely to have it available from their networks. Hence this study highlights the need of providing support through formal channels in the community.
Originality/value
By treating support as a dependent variable, this study sheds light on the factors related to low‐income mothers' social well‐being and helps reveal the conditions that can impede their participation in support networks.
Keywords
Citation
Offer, S. (2012), "Barriers to social support among low‐income mothers", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 32 No. 3/4, pp. 120-133. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443331211214712
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited