To read this content please select one of the options below:

Comparing the validity and utility of behavior description interview versus assessment center ratings

Gedaliahu H. Harel (Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel)
Anat Arditi‐Vogel (Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel)
Tom Janz (Personnel Decisions International, Irving, Texas, USA)

Journal of Managerial Psychology

ISSN: 0268-3946

Article publication date: 1 March 2003

5079

Abstract

This research investigated the relationship between job performance ratings for 39 Israeli medical unit managers and two types of performance predictor: ratings from behavior description (BD) interviews and ratings from an assessment center. The BD validity 0.53 compared favorably with the 0.62 obtained by the assessment center. Utility analyses that table the financial return for investing in the more expensive assessment process under different levels of tenure, number of new hires, and selection ratio, reveal the conditions under which assessment centers pay off best.

Keywords

Citation

Harel, G.H., Arditi‐Vogel, A. and Janz, T. (2003), "Comparing the validity and utility of behavior description interview versus assessment center ratings", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940310465009

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles