To read this content please select one of the options below:

International Cash Management and Hedging: A Comparison of UK and French Companies

John Capstaff (Department of Accounting and Finance, Curran Building, University of Strathclyde 100 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G4 0LN, Scotland, UK)
Andrew Marshall (Department of Accounting and Finance, Curran Building, University of Strathclyde 100 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G4 0LN, Scotland, UK)

Managerial Finance

ISSN: 0307-4358

Article publication date: 1 October 2005

2117

Abstract

Several papers have investigated the use of foreign exchange (FX) derivatives but evidence on the use of international cash management meth ods to hedge FX is scarce. This paper contributes to the existing evidence by considering the use of international cash management systems to hedge foreign exchange (FX) risks using a sample of French and UK companies. We find that matching, netting and pricing policies are the most commonly used techniques in both the UK and French samples al though there is evidence of greater use of all cash management techniques in the UK. We also consider whether the theoretical explanations of hedging determine the use of cash management techniques for FX hedging, and if there are differences between the UK and French samples. We find support for the theoretical prediction that FX hedgers have higher levels of financial distress, and that these firms tend to be larger, more international and less liquid. We find little support for the under investment theory. The extent of internationalisation appears to play no role in the decision of French firms to use cash management techniques to manage FX risk, and the use of all cash management techniques were lower than in UK firms. These latter findings may be explained by the reduction in FX risk facing French firms following the introduction of the euro.

Keywords

Citation

Capstaff, J. and Marshall, A. (2005), "International Cash Management and Hedging: A Comparison of UK and French Companies", Managerial Finance, Vol. 31 No. 10, pp. 18-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350510769893

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles