To read this content please select one of the options below:

A comparison of two editions of the RIBA Plan of Work

W.P. Hughes (W.P. Hughes is a Reader in Construction Management and Economics at the School of Construction Management and Engineering, University of Reading, Reading, UK.)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 1 October 2003

4081

Abstract

The RIBA Plan of Work describes the way a construction process should be organized. Although not officially approved by the RIBA council, a new plan of work was published in 2000 with the intention of replacing the RIBA Plan of Work, so it is useful to analyse both in terms of the organizational structure they impose upon construction projects. Using analytical principles from organizational theory, both plans are analysed by converting them into organizational matrices and assessing their relative complexities, the load on participants, decentralization of responsibility, number of interfaces and the extent to which they provide for co‐ordination and control. This demonstrates first, that the analysis of organizational structure is an appropriate approach for undertaking comparisons of such documents; and second, that while both plans of work are of roughly equal complexity, the new one is more demanding on the participants; produces a higher number of interfaces between processes, and provides for more co‐ordination than the old one. Neither plan deals with controlling the output of individuals, leaving it as an internal matter for each participating organization.

Keywords

Citation

Hughes, W.P. (2003), "A comparison of two editions of the RIBA Plan of Work", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 10 No. 5, pp. 302-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980310502919

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2003, MCB UP Limited

Related articles