To read this content please select one of the options below:

Estimating as a profession in UK construction

James A. Hackett (Department of Engineering, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK)
Carolyn M. Hicks (Department of Health Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 16 January 2007

1882

Abstract

Purpose

Both quantity surveyors (QSs) and estimators have pivotal roles in the profitability of construction contracts; however, only the QS is classified as a professional. Preliminary examination of the responsibilities of the estimator and the level of qualification required in comparison with the QS suggests that the current failure to recognise estimating as a profession may be an anomaly. The purpose of this inquiry is to consider the role of the estimator relative to the accepted criteria attaching to professional status.

Design/methodology/approach

To achieve this, available definitions of a profession were distilled into core criteria which were then used to compare QSs and estimators in terms of remuneration, education and professional representation.

Findings

A statistical analysis on each of these criteria suggested that there was no significant difference in terms of salary offered or education required by employers. Further investigation, however, did reveal a considerable difference in educational and professional opportunities available to QSs. With regard to the key defining criteria of a profession and the consideration given by employers, the results indicate that there is no difference between the two groups.

Originality/value

Given the information revealed by this research it may therefore be the case that the current standing of estimators should be reconsidered with the purpose of upgrading estimating to a professional status.

Keywords

Citation

Hackett, J.A. and Hicks, C.M. (2007), "Estimating as a profession in UK construction", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 26-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980710716963

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles