To read this content please select one of the options below:

Guaranteed maximum price (GMP) contracts in practice: A case study of a private office development project in Hong Kong

Daniel W.M. Chan (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)
Patrick T.I. Lam (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)
Albert P.C. Chan (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)
James M.W. Wong (Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 1 March 2011

2106

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the operational mechanism, project performance, motives behind, benefits, difficulties and success factors of adopting the guaranteed maximum price (GMP) scheme based on a real‐life case study of Chater House, an international Grade A private office project in Hong Kong.

Design/methodology/approach

The case project was analysed by means of the related project documentation and a series of face‐to‐face interviews with the relevant senior project representatives.

Findings

All the interviewed key project stakeholders perceived that the GMP contract helped achieve competitive price, value for money and superior quality of products as well as provided stronger incentives to innovation and cost saving. The case study revealed that the overall success of this GMP project was underpinned by several key attributes.

Originality/value

The paper provides solid groundwork for client bodies and contracting organisations to develop a best practice framework for implementing successful GMP schemes in future construction.

Keywords

Citation

Chan, D.W.M., Lam, P.T.I., Chan, A.P.C. and Wong, J.M.W. (2011), "Guaranteed maximum price (GMP) contracts in practice: A case study of a private office development project in Hong Kong", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 188-205. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981111111157

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles