To read this content please select one of the options below:

How advertising slogans can prime evaluations of brand extensions: further empirical results

Kevin Pryor (Faculty of Commerce, Auckland Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand)
Roderick J. Brodie (Professor of Marketing, Department of Marketing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand)

Journal of Product & Brand Management

ISSN: 1061-0421

Article publication date: 1 December 1998

5969

Abstract

A replication of Boush’s exploratory study provides further evidence about how advertising slogans prime evaluations of brand extensions. Two hypotheses are investigated. First, that a brand extension will be rated as more similar to existing family‐branded products if the advertising slogan primes attributes that the brand extension shares with existing products than if the slogan primes attributes that the brand extension does not share with the existing family‐branded products. Second, given a positively evaluated brand, a brand extension will be evaluated more positively if the advertising slogan primes features that the extension shares with existing family‐branded products than if the slogan primes attributes that the brand extension does not share with existing family‐branded products. The research shows priming can play an important role in supporting or undermining a brand extension strategy by drawing attention to attributes either that a new product has in common with existing products or that conflict with existing products.

Keywords

Citation

Pryor, K. and Brodie, R.J. (1998), "How advertising slogans can prime evaluations of brand extensions: further empirical results", Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 497-508. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429810244666

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1998, MCB UP Limited

Related articles