To read this content please select one of the options below:

Expert knowledge for non‐experts: Inherent and contextual risks of misinformation

Anton Vedder (TILT, Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90.153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands)

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society

ISSN: 1477-996X

Article publication date: 31 August 2005

267

Abstract

One of the most significant aspects of Internet, in comparison with other sources of information, such as libraries, books, journals, television, radio etcetera, is that it makes expert knowledge much more accessible to non‐experts than the other traditional sources. This phenomenon has often been applauded for its democratizing effects. Unfortunately, there is also a disadvantage. Expert information that was originally intended for a specific group of people ‐ and not in any way processed or adapted to make it fit for a broader audience ‐ can easily be misunderstood and misinterpreted by non‐experts and, when used as a basis for decisions, lead to unhappy consequences. Can these risks be diminished without limiting the informational freedoms of the information providers and without imposing paternalistic measures regarding the receivers of the information?

Keywords

Citation

Vedder, A. (2005), "Expert knowledge for non‐experts: Inherent and contextual risks of misinformation", Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/14779960580000265

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles