To read this content please select one of the options below:

An integrated methodology to prioritise improvement initiatives in low volume‐high integrity product manufacturing organisations

Ben Marriott (School of Technology, The University of Derby, Derby, UK)
Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes (School of Technology, The University of Derby, Derby, UK)
Horacio Soriano‐Meier (Northampton Business School, The University of Northampton, Northampton, UK)
Jiju Antony (Department of Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK)

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

ISSN: 1741-038X

Article publication date: 1 February 2013

1103

Abstract

Purpose

Several authors have proposed different approaches to help practitioners deal with the complexity of prioritising improvement projects and initiatives. However, these approaches have been developed as “generic” methods which do not consider the specific needs, objectives and capabilities of different industries and organisations. The purpose of this paper is to present an integrated methodology that prioritises improvement projects or initiatives based on two key performance objectives, cost and quality, specifically important for low volume‐high integrity product manufacturers.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper reviews some of the most commonly used prioritisation methods and the theory and logic behind the proposed prioritisation methodology. Then, the prioritisation methodology is empirically tested, through a case study, in a world class manufacturing organisation.

Findings

The results obtained from the case study indicate that the integrated methodology proposed in this paper is an effective alternative for low volume‐high integrity products manufacturers to identify, select and justify improvement priorities.

Practical implications

Selection and prioritisation of projects and initiatives are key elements for the successful implementation of improvements. The integrated methodology presented in this paper intends to aid organisations in dealing with the complexity that is normally handled over the selection and prioritisation of feasible improvement projects.

Originality/value

This paper presents a novel methodology that integrates two commonly used approaches in industry, Process Activity Mapping (PAM) and Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), to prioritise improvements. This methodology can help, in particular, organisations embarked in the manufacture of low volume‐high integrity products to take better decisions and align the focus of improvement efforts with their overall performance and strategic objectives.

Keywords

Citation

Marriott, B., Arturo Garza‐Reyes, J., Soriano‐Meier, H. and Antony, J. (2013), "An integrated methodology to prioritise improvement initiatives in low volume‐high integrity product manufacturing organisations", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 197-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381311292304

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles