To read this content please select one of the options below:

Analysis of stress distribution in compression precracking

Jianguo Yu (Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA)
Daniel Kujawski (Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA)

International Journal of Structural Integrity

ISSN: 1757-9864

Article publication date: 28 May 2010

827

Abstract

Purpose

The paper aims to shed some light on the effect of the notch/crack‐tip stresses and their role on the cyclic plasticity and crack growth behavior in compression‐compression fatigue.

Design/methodology/approach

Compression precracking was studied using 2D finite element analysis for CT specimen. The final crack length and the shape of the crack front were compared with those obtained experimentally.

Findings

It has been found that cyclic plasticity and stress redistribution govern the observed fatigue crack growth behavior in compression‐compression precracking. Only the internal stress corresponding to Pmax shows a significant redistribution with the crack extension whereas the stress corresponding Pmin is not affected by the increase of crack length.

Research limitations/implications

This results are limited to Mode I cracking.

Practical implications

It supports that two thresholds, ΔKth and Kmaxth, govern the fatigue crack behavior. When the contribution from the internal tensile stress is not big enough to make Kmax exceed Kmaxth the crack will self arrest.

Originality/value

It has been found that cyclic plasticity and stress redistribution govern the observed fatigue crack growth behavior in compression‐compression precracking. The comparison of the numerical results with experimental data in terms of final crack length and crack front shape indicated a fair agreement.

Keywords

Citation

Yu, J. and Kujawski, D. (2010), "Analysis of stress distribution in compression precracking", International Journal of Structural Integrity, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 140-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/17579861011053871

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles