To read this content please select one of the options below:

Has increased prominence of translation results changed net investment hedging practice?

Beverly Marshall (Department of Finance, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA)
Han Jin (School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Platteville, Platteville, Wisconsin, USA)

Accounting Research Journal

ISSN: 1030-9616

Article publication date: 29 August 2023

Issue publication date: 17 October 2023

138

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of greater reporting prominence of translation results following Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2011-05 on net investment (NI) hedging practice. The authors investigate the role of increased transparency on the decision to engage in NI hedging (participation), the degree of NI hedging (level) and the hedging vehicle choice.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper uses the Heckman two-stage procedure (Heckman, 1979) in the hedging choice analysis. In the first stage, the authors model the participation decision as a function of reporting transparency, translation results and other control variables. In the second stage, the authors include the Inverse Mills ratio from the first stage Probit to examine both the level and vehicle choice decisions.

Findings

When translation is reported more prominently, the authors find an increase in the level of NI hedging and a greater likelihood of debt as the hedging vehicle, but no evidence firms are more likely to hedge. Regardless of where translation results are reported, firms facing ongoing translation losses are more likely to hedge.

Research limitations/implications

This paper examines S&P 500 firms in the years surrounding the effective date of ASU 2011-05. The findings suggest managers respond to the increase in reporting transparency by increasing hedging for long-term risk management purposes, supporting accounting authorities’ efforts to promote other comprehensive income information transparency. The results should hold for comparable firms with similar currency exposure, size and visibility, but may not apply to smaller firms with limited translation exposure. As only about a quarter of firms with translation exposure engage in NI hedging, the primary results are based on a relatively limited number of firms.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that examines NI hedging behavior changes following ASU-2011-05. Second, the authors are the first to explore why firms are almost equally split between derivatives and debt as their exclusive hedging vehicle.

Keywords

Citation

Marshall, B. and Jin, H. (2023), "Has increased prominence of translation results changed net investment hedging practice?", Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 36 No. 4/5, pp. 415-433. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-10-2022-0272

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles