To read this content please select one of the options below:

Consumers’ perceptions of meat safety and quality – a qualitative content analysis from Afghanistan

Mustafa Nasiri (International PhD Program in Agricultural Economics, Bioeconomy and Sustainable Food Systems (IPPAE), Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany) (Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Nutritional Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute for Agricultural Policy and Market Research, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany)
Birgit Gassler (Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Nutritional Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute for Agricultural Policy and Market Research, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany)
Ramona Teuber (Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Nutritional Sciences and Environmental Management, Institute for Agricultural Policy and Market Research, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany) (Centre for Sustainable Food Systems, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany)

British Food Journal

ISSN: 0007-070X

Article publication date: 30 May 2023

Issue publication date: 29 August 2023

263

Abstract

Purpose

This study analyses consumers’ perception of meat quality and safety in Afghanistan at the pre-harvest, harvest and post-harvest stages.

Design/methodology/approach

Qualitative data were collected through seven focus group discussions with 52 participants in Kabul and Bamyan, Afghanistan, between September and December 2020. A qualitative content analysis was undertaken using the Total Food Quality Model and the MAXQDA software.

Findings

At the pre-harvest stage, both sedentary and nomadic ruminants’ meat was perceived as high in quality and safety, with lower food safety hazards, unlike urban-raised ruminants’ meat. At the harvest stage, supermarket meat was perceived as better in hygiene, but not in freshness. Additionally, there were doubts about the Halal-slaughtering of this meat. Conversely, butchery meat was perceived as fresh, natural and trustworthy, but unhygienic. At the post-harvest stage, the most important quality attributes before purchase were color, freshness, place-of-origin, safety and Halal-slaughtering, and after purchase were taste and tenderness. Lack of consumer trust was also noticed for the formal institution, i.e. supermarket meat.

Research limitations/implications

This study provides valuable new results from Afghanistan that could be transferred to other Islamic-developing countries given the similarities in their meat industry, i.e. availability of both formal and informal institutions, and the sensitivity of Muslim consumers to Halal-slaughtering. Nonetheless, the qualitative nature of the study design demands further research, employing, e.g. a quantitative approach. Future studies conducted in other countries with similar context could validate the results of this paper.

Originality/value

Knowledge on consumer behavior in Afghanistan is scarce. The present study is one among a few that provides empirical evidence on Afghan consumers. Additionally, it is the first study to compare consumers’ perceptions of traditional butchery meat and supermarket meat.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) under the program Development-Related Postgraduate Courses (EPOS), contract number P1401273, is gratefully acknowledged. Acknowledgments are also due to Dr. Dawlatshah Poyesh from Bamyan University, Afghanistan, and Mr. Khadim Hussain Hamdam from Kabul University, Afghanistan, for their valuable cooperation during the field visit and data collection phase.

Citation

Nasiri, M., Gassler, B. and Teuber, R. (2023), "Consumers’ perceptions of meat safety and quality – a qualitative content analysis from Afghanistan", British Food Journal, Vol. 125 No. 9, pp. 3404-3421. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2022-0646

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles