To read this content please select one of the options below:

The gold standard: developing a maturity model to assess collaborative scheduling

Natalie M. Scala (Business Analytics and Technology Management, Towson University, Towson, Maryland, USA)
Min Liu (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA)
Thais da Costa Lago Alves (Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA)
Vincent Schiavone (Business Analytics and Technology Management, Towson University, Towson, Maryland, USA)
Dominique Hawkins (Business Analytics and Technology Management, Towson University, Towson, Maryland, USA)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 3 February 2022

Issue publication date: 8 May 2023

255

Abstract

Purpose

The overall contribution of this work is to provide a usable maturity model for collaborative scheduling (CS) that extends the literature, identifies inconsistencies in schedule development, and improves collaboration in the construction industry.

Design/methodology/approach

Via subject matter expert elicitation and focus groups, the maturity model establishes five pillars of collaboration—scheduling significance, planners and schedulers, scheduling representation, goal alignment with owner, and communication. The maturity model is then validated through iterative feedback and chi-squared statistical analysis of data obtained from a survey. The five pillars are tied to the literature and previous work in CS.

Findings

The analysis shows that current industry projects are not consistent in collaboration practice implementation, and the maturity model identifies areas for collaboration improvement. The study's contributions to the body of knowledge are (1) developing a maturity model-based approach to define and measure the current level of collaboration and (2) discovering the level of consistency in scheduling collaboration practice implementation.

Practical implications

The findings provide a benchmark for self-evaluation and peer-to-peer comparison for project managers. The model is also useful for project managers to develop effective strategies for improvement on targeted dimensions and metrics.

Originality/value

The construction engineering and management (CEM) literature does not contain targeted models for scheduling collaboration in the context of maturity and, broadly speaking, neither does the literature at large. The literature also lacks actionable items as presented for the maturity model for collaborative scheduling (MMCS).

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Construction Industry Institute, as Research Team RT-362, “Challenges and Opportunities to Promote Collaborative Scheduling.” The authors would also like to thank Chuanni He for his assistance with compiling Table 2.

Citation

Scala, N.M., Liu, M., Alves, T.d.C.L., Schiavone, V. and Hawkins, D. (2023), "The gold standard: developing a maturity model to assess collaborative scheduling", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 1636-1656. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2021-0609

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles