Critical theory, institutions, and hegemony: role obligation and the reconciliation of seemingly incompatible goals

Abstract

Literature on critical and institutional theories are often perceived to be incompatible, despite a shared conceptual grounding. By clearly defining and understanding the concepts of “hegemony” and “role obligations” one might address this misconception of incompatibility, and allow the development of a framework to bridge the concepts of institutions and critical theory. This bridge allows the two streams of literature to meaningfully benefit from each intellectual space. This bridge can ultimately be used to inform both theory and practice in the study of organizations.

Citation

Sementelli, A.J. (2005), "Critical theory, institutions, and hegemony: role obligation and the reconciliation of seemingly incompatible goals", International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 559-576. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-08-04-2005-B006