Integration of analytic hierarchy process and Dempster-Shafer theory for supplier performance measurement considering risk

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide proactive supply chain performance method considering risk which can be used during the supplier selection/assessment process.

Design/methodology/approach

In this paper, the effort is to present a model for evaluating the supply-related risk, which is based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method and the Dempster-Shafer theory (DST). The proactive risk management methods used in this research is: seeking risk sources and identifying the variables to be used in the model, preprocessing the variables data to get the directions of the variables and the risk bounds, assigning variables weights via AHP method and finally evaluating the supply risk via DST method and determine the final risk degree.

Findings

The paper contributes to research in risk assessment in the specific field of supplier performance measurement. In this paper, a hybrid model using AHP and DST for risk assessment of supplier based on performance measurement is presented. An empirical analysis is conducted to illustrate the use of the model for the risk assessment in supply chain.

Research limitations/implications

This methodology can be adopted by supply chain managers to evaluate the level of risk associated with current suppliers, and to assist them in making outsourcing decisions.

Originality/value

The proposed method makes a contribution by including risk as a performance measure in supply chain. The generated proactive supply risk assessment process uses a hybrid model of AHP and DST providing a novel approach for performance measurement which will be valuable both to academics and practitioners in this field.

Citation

Ganguly, K. (2014), "Integration of analytic hierarchy process and Dempster-Shafer theory for supplier performance measurement considering risk", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2012-0117