To read this content please select one of the options below:

Rethinking urban destination marketing

John Heeley (Best Destination Marketing, Sheffiled, UK and Visiting Fellow, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK)

International Journal of Tourism Cities

ISSN: 2056-5607

Article publication date: 8 February 2016

1022

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to trace the emergence of a dominant paradigm from within which academics and practitioners alike currently describe and otherwise explain urban destination marketing. The paradigm has been dubbed the “theory of marketing competitive advantage (CA)” by the author, and by others as the “4P’s marketing paradigm”. To effectively market themselves as tourism destinations, this paradigm requires towns and cities to differentiate themselves through the provision of more or less unique products, based on which they subsequently undertake branding, market positioning, distribution and other activities through bespoke destination marketing organisations (DMOs).

Design/methodology/approach

The paper summarises the findings of: first, a review of the academic and practitioner literature on urban destination marketing; second, an online investigation of urban destination marketing in 62 European towns and cities, consulting the corporate and consumer pages of the relevant DMO website; and third, in-depth interviews with 20 senior DMO departmental executives. Each interview was recorded digitally for subsequent transcribing, and was conducted on the basis of a semi-structured interview schedule.

Findings

Theory, as enshrined in the “4P’s marketing paradigm” rarely holds up in practice. Irrespective of whether or not a town or city possesses CA (and few do), DMO marketing gravitates almost inexorably towards a “marketing of everything”. Moreover, much the greater part of urban destination marketing is ineffective, failing to create visitors and deliver the commercial and economic returns on which it is premised. Against a backdrop of DMO marginality and ineffectiveness and a reluctance by them to market what is special and different about places, the continued existence of DMOs and the destination marketing they undertake is thrown into serious question.

Research limitations/implications

Interpretation is unavoidably subjective in parts, drawing on personal experience as well as research undertaken.

Originality/value

This paper is intended to give the reader an understanding of why success is so problematic in urban destination marketing, serving as an antidote to the prevailing idealised, normative and unproblematic picture of the DMO world as this is depicted from within the prevailing “4P’s marketing paradigm”. The research method provides a basis on which to unite theory and practice in the field of urban destination marketing in a more systematic and verifiable manner than has hitherto ever been the case.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

© International Tourism Studies Association

Citation

Heeley, J. (2016), "Rethinking urban destination marketing", International Journal of Tourism Cities, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-01-2016-0003

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles