To read this content please select one of the options below:

The changing IFRS debate in the USA: a rejoinder

Minga Negash (Department of Accounting, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA)
Andrew Holt (Department of Accounting, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA)
John Hathorn (Department of Accounting, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA)

Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change

ISSN: 1832-5912

Article publication date: 6 March 2017

1357

Abstract

Purpose

The debate on whether global accounting standards are appropriate for use within the US regulatory environment has not yet ended. Nearly four years after the release of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) much awaited report on the issue, the position of the regulator is still unclear, and the US accounting community is uncertain about the potential for accounting change. This paper aims to examine the documented reasons for the absence of direction and clarity on this issue.

Design/methodology/approach

Using the theoretical and empirical contributions of prior research on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), this study explores the potential for US adoption of IFRS by examining the main arguments forwarded by the Office of the Chief Accountant of the SEC and the International Accounting Standards Board’s response to the issues raised and by capturing the opinions of 22 graduate and 32 undergraduate students as surrogates for future practicing accountants. The student data were collected from homework submissions to an essay on US accounting convergence with IFRS.

Findings

From the analysis, the authors make four observations. First, the deliberations over IFRS adoption in the USA are not sufficiently grounded on principles of recognition, measurement and disclosure. Second, the evidence does not support the notion that IFRS is of inferior quality to current US generally accepted accounting principles. Third, the problem areas stem from the apparent divergence of the objectives ascribed to financial statements, the independence and public accountability of the global standard setter and standards that are connected with the regulation of the finance and insurance industries. The final observation is the political process of managing change in the standard setting/adoption process in the USA.

Originality/value

This paper provides a comprehensive appraisal and a change management perspective to the ongoing IFRS debate in the USA by soliciting and documenting the opinions of future practicing accountants.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Useful comments were received from the reviewers and participants of the August 2014 Annual Meeting of the American Accounting Association held in Atlanta, Georgia.

Citation

Negash, M., Holt, A. and Hathorn, J. (2017), "The changing IFRS debate in the USA: a rejoinder", Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-02-2015-0020

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles