To read this content please select one of the options below:

US technological statecraft towards China

Halil Deligöz (Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey)

Journal of International Trade Law and Policy

ISSN: 1477-0024

Article publication date: 19 April 2024

13

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to define a “technological statecraft” concept to distinguish tech-based measures/sanctions from an array of economic measures ranging from restrictions of rare earth elements and natural gas supplies to asset freezes under the wider portfolio of economic statecraft. This concept is practically intended to reveal the USA’s “logic of choice” in its employment of technology as an efficient instrument to deal with China in the context of the great power rivalry.

Design/methodology/approach

This study follows David A. Baldwin’s statecraft definition and conceptualization methodology, which relies on “means” rather than “ends.” In addition to Baldwin and as an incremental contribution to his economic statecraft analysis, this study also combines national political economy with statecraft analysis with a particular focus on the utilization of technological measures against China during the Trump administration.

Findings

The US rationale for choosing technology, namely, emerging and foundational technologies, in its rivalry against China is caused at least by two factors: the nature of the external challenge and the characteristics of the US innovation model based largely on radical innovations. To deal with China, the USA practically distinguished the role of advanced technology and followed a grammer of technological statecraft as depicted in the promulgated legal texts during the Trump administration.

Originality/value

Despite a growing volume of literature on economic statecraft and technological competition, studies focusing on countries’ “logic of choice” with regard to why and under what conditions they choose financial, technological or commodity-based sanctions/measures/controls are lacking. Inspired from Baldwin’s account on the “logic of choice” from among alternative statecrafts (i.e. diplomacy, military, economic statecraft, and propaganda). This study will contribute to the literature with a clear lens to demonstrate the “logic of choice” from among a variety of economic statecraft measures in the case of the US technological statecraft toward China.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This article is based on the conceptual part of the author’s PhD dissertation, and he would like to thank his PhD supervisor Dr Christian Wilhelm Lekon and two anonymous reviewers for their precious comments.

Citation

Deligöz, H. (2024), "US technological statecraft towards China", Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-10-2023-0059

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles