Knowledge seeking or sabotage? The effect of coworker relative overqualification on employee reaction from social comparison theory

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate the phenomenon of knowledge transfer between employees and coworkers. That is, when and why employees engage in knowledge seeking or knowledge sabotage when confronted with coworkers with higher relative overqualification.

Design/methodology/approach

This study collected survey data from 315 employee-coworker pairs in East China at three-time points.

Findings

The results showed that when the cooperative goal interdependence between employee and coworker is high, the perception of coworker’s relative overqualification will cause benign envy of employees, which in turn promote employees to engage in knowledge seeking from coworker. However, when the competitive goal interdependence between employee and coworker is high, the perception of coworker’s relative overqualification will cause malicious envy of employees, which in turn promote employees to engage in knowledge sabotage toward coworker.

Originality/value

This research not only expands the theoretical perspective and outcomes of relative overqualification but also enriches the mechanism of knowledge seeking and knowledge sabotage. Meanwhile, this study also provides practical guidance for enterprises to reduce knowledge sabotage.

Citation

Zhu, Y., Long, L., Xu, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2024), "Knowledge seeking or sabotage? The effect of coworker relative overqualification on employee reaction from social comparison theory", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 724-742. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2023-0163