To read this content please select one of the options below:

Public university presidential compensation: Performance, cost efficiency and spending choices

Gus Gordon (Accounting, College of Business and Technology, The University of Texas, Tyler)
Mary Fischer (Accounting, College of Business and Technology, The University of Texas, Tyler)

Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management

ISSN: 1096-3367

Article publication date: 1 March 2014

183

Abstract

Given the well-reported concerns over cost containment in public higher education, we believe performance should be measured based on cost efficiency and spending choices. This study develops three regression models linking presidential pay and public university performance with data for public universities that have no president change for fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2010. Analysis finds a statistically significant inverse relationship between presidential pay and resources devoted to instruction, the primary mission of most universities. A relationship for presidential compensation and enrollment is found for the individual fiscal years examined but not over time. Presidential compensation over time is positively related to spending on areas other than instruction.

Citation

Gordon, G. and Fischer, M. (2014), "Public university presidential compensation: Performance, cost efficiency and spending choices", Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 557-583. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-26-04-2014-B002

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014 by PrAcademics Press

Related articles