To read this content please select one of the options below:

Incorporating mental health into health impact assessment in the United States: a systematic review

Kelsey Lucyk (Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada)
Kim Gilhuly (Human Impact Partners, Oakland, California, USA)
Ame-Lia Tamburrini (Habitat Health Impact Consulting, Calgary, Canada)
Bethany Rogerson (Health Impact Project, a collaboration of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, District of Columbia, USA)

Journal of Public Mental Health

ISSN: 1746-5729

Article publication date: 19 September 2016

202

Abstract

Purpose

Health impact assessment (HIA) is a systematic research and public engagement tool used to elevate health and equity in public policies. However, HIA practitioners often overlook potential mental health impacts. The purpose of this paper is to review the degree to which mental health is included in HIAs in the USA.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors conducted a systematic review of 156 HIAs that were completed between 1993 and 2013 for their inclusion of mental health. HIAs were subdivided to assess if mental health conditions or their determinants were measured, and if predictions or mitigation strategies were made in the scoping, assessment, or recommendations phases.

Findings

Overall, 73.1 percent of HIAs included mental health. Of the HIAs that included mental health (n=114), 85.1 percent also included the determinants of mental health and 67.6 percent included mental health outcomes. 37.7 percent of HIAs measured baseline mental health conditions and 64.0 percent predicted changes in mental health as the result of implementing the proposed policy, plan, or program. Among the HIAs that made predictions about mental health, 79.5 percent included recommendations for potential changes in mental health, while only 46.6 percent had measured mental health at baseline.

Research limitations/implications

Although many HIAs included mental health in some capacity, this paper quantifies that mental health is not included in a robust way in HIAs in the USA. This presents a difficulty for efforts to address the growing issues of mental health and mental health inequities in the populations.

Originality/value

This paper represents the first academic endeavor to systematically assess the state of the field of HIA for its inclusion of mental health.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Kelsey Lucyk was supported by a Population Health Intervention Research Network Research Policy Internship, funded by CIHR, to complete this work and is currently supported by an Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions Graduate Studentship.

Citation

Lucyk, K., Gilhuly, K., Tamburrini, A.-L. and Rogerson, B. (2016), "Incorporating mental health into health impact assessment in the United States: a systematic review", Journal of Public Mental Health, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 150-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-01-2016-0003

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles