To read this content please select one of the options below:

Residual life assessment method for polymethyl methacrylate

Tao Wei (School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China)
Sijin Zhao (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A and F University, Yangling, China)
Zongzhan Gao (School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China)
Ke Zhang (School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China)
Wenxuan Gou (School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China)
Yangfan Dang (School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China)

Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures

ISSN: 1573-6105

Article publication date: 15 June 2020

Issue publication date: 15 June 2020

89

Abstract

Purpose

Fatigue and creep are the key factors for the failure of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) in the engineering structure, so a great of quantity attention is focused on the life prediction under the creep and fatigue conditions. This paper aims to mainly summarize the traditional life assessment method (S–N curve), life assessment method based on crazing density and life assessment method based on transmittance. S–N curve and classical creep curve are introduced on the traditional life assessment method; the variation of the craze density with the logarithm of cyclic numbers is given in different fatigue load. A linear relationship is obtained, and a higher stress leads to a higher slope, suggesting a faster growth of craze. Furthermore, a craze density model is purposed to describe this relationship; the variation of craze density with the time at different creep load is given. The craze density has two obvious stages. At the first stage, craze density ranged from approximately 0.02 to 0.17, and a linear relationship is obtained. In the following stage, a nonlinear relationship appears till specimen rupture, a new creep life model is proposed to depict two stages. The relationship between transmission and time under creep load is shown. With increasing of time, the transmittance shows a nonlinear decrease. Through polynomial nonlinear fitting, a relationship between the transmittance and residual life can be obtained. To provide reference for the life assessment of transparent materials, the paper compares three life assessment methods of PMMA.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper uses the traditional life assessment method (S–N curve), life assessment method based on crazing density, life assessment method based on transmittance.

Findings

The variation of the craze density with the logarithm of cyclic numbers is given in different fatigue loads. A linear relationship is obtained, and a higher stress leads to a higher slope, suggesting a faster growth of craze. Furthermore, a craze density model is proposed to describe this relationship, and the variation of craze density with the time at different creep loads is given. The craze density has two obvious stages. The relationship between transmission and time under creep load is shown. With increasing of time, the transmittance shows a nonlinear decrease. Through polynomial nonlinear fitting, a relationship between the transmittance and residual life can be obtained.

Originality/value

Fatigue and creep are the key factors for the failure of PMMA in the engineering structure, so a great of quantity attention is focused on the life prediction under the conditions of creep and fatigue. This paper mainly summarizes traditional life assessment method (S–N curve), life assessment method based on crazing density and life assessment method based on transmittance.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51205312).

Citation

Wei, T., Zhao, S., Gao, Z., Zhang, K., Gou, W. and Dang, Y. (2020), "Residual life assessment method for polymethyl methacrylate", Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 679-687. https://doi.org/10.1108/MMMS-07-2019-0126

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles