Anti-bureaucratic Identities among Top Bureaucrats? Societal Norms and Professional Practices among Senior Civil Servants in Britain, France and Norway

Abstract

How do top bureaucrats define, in their own words, their professional identity and the norms they work by? Do they define them in line with a Weberian ideal type of the bureaucrat and bureaucratic norms? Or rather by a modernised entrepreneurial ideal type, often associated with New Public Management reforms? Further, what can such self-presentations tell us about professional norms operating in top bureaucrats’ daily work, and about institutional or wider societal logics guiding the non-elected, administrative side of contemporary government? The top officials, the senior civil servants in central ministries, who take part in policy-making and serve the political leadership, have a specific role distinct from that of the politicians and are guided by professional norms. Scholars focusing on this level of top bureaucrats have described their professional norms as being about serving the elected politicians loyally, but also contributing technical and thematic expertise independent of political considerations and ensuring that policy is developed according to legal standards. This chapter investigates how top bureaucrats themselves define those norms and that role – is it in line with an ideal close to Weberian ideal type characteristics, or not?

Citation

Mangset, M. (2018), "Anti-bureaucratic Identities among Top Bureaucrats? Societal Norms and Professional Practices among Senior Civil Servants in Britain, France and Norway", Bureaucracy and Society in Transition (Comparative Social Research, Vol. 33), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 109-137. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0195-631020180000033010